Workforce
Covid-19
Data
Forecasting
Economy
Analysis
Consulting
Staffing
Pro
Economic Trends

Vaccine Mandates Appear to Have No Effect on Quit Rate

As the percentage of workers quitting their jobs rises to new highs, employer vaccine requirements have been suggested as a potential cause.

As the percentage of workers quitting their jobs rises to new highs, employer vaccine requirements have been suggested as a potential cause. Data suggest, however, that vaccine mandates had limited effect on overall state quit rates after they were enacted.

To limit cases and spread of the COVID-19 virus in 2021, 24 states required at least some workers to get the vaccine or be tested weekly to maintain employment. Another 24 states passed legislation that prohibits any such vaccine mandate. Three states landed in the middle, not introducing a vaccine mandate but also not prohibiting one, just recommending vaccinations. The state policies are summarized in the map below.[1]

vaccine_quits01


Vaccine mandates were announced and took effect largely in September and October 2021. At the time, 37% of workers in a survey said they would quit their jobs if their employer required that they get a COVID-19 vaccine or be tested weekly. That number increased to 72% if they were not offered the weekly testing option, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) Covid-19 Vaccine Monitor.[2] Those surveys suggest vaccine mandates would lead to a large number of quits. Even so, it is easy to say you would quit hypothetically and much more difficult to face the reality of actually giving up a job.[3] Chmura utilized the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) data to evaluate this claim.

States are separated according to policies in effect at the end of 2021, but these policies were not all implemented at the same time. In August, some states had announced mandates, with policies for state employees and healthcare workers taking effect in California and Nevada, and for state employees in Hawaii. Another nine states and the District of Columbia had policies take effect in September, again primarily affecting state employees, healthcare workers, education workers, and employees at nursing homes. Finally, ten states had mandates take effect in October. Twenty-four states created laws or executive orders over this period which prohibit vaccine requirements, while three states only recommended vaccines. In August, the average quit rate in states which would announce vaccine mandates was 2.0%, compared with 2.5% in states which would prohibit vaccine mandates, and 2.8% in states which would only recommend vaccinations.

By September, workers in states with prohibitions against vaccine requirements quit at a rate of 3.3%, while workers in states with these mandates were quitting at a slower rate of 3.1%, on average. Hawaii is an outlier in these data, with quits rising to 6.6% in September, from 3.3% in August. The high quits rate in September could be related to a delayed response to vaccine policies which had taken effect the previous month, and state and local government employment declined 1.3% in Hawaii between August and September 2021, but there are also many other factors at play. Excluding Hawaii, the average quits rate for states with a vaccine or testing requirement was 2.9%. States which only recommended vaccinations saw an average quits rate of 3.5%.

In October, vaccine and testing policies were in effect for 23 states and the District of Columbia, but the quits pattern remained the same. Workers in states with these policies quit at an average rate of 2.8%, compared with an average rate of 3.1% for states prohibiting vaccine requirements and an average 3.2% rate in states which just recommended vaccinations. Hawaii’s quits rate fell back in line with the group average, at 2.9% in October. These data are summarized in the figure below.

vc_03

Lower quit rates in these states are not outside of their historical patterns. As shown in the figure below, states which required vaccine mandates have typically had lower rates of workers quitting than states which recommended vaccines or prohibit vaccine requirements. It is important to note, however, that there is no shift in this pattern as vaccine and testing requirements went into effect in fall 2021; in other words, based on quits rate data there is no evidence that mandates increased quits in these states over this period.

vc_04

Data on quits are not available by sector by state, but we might expect to see changes in overall employment in sectors directly affected by mandates. The charts below show the average change in employment month to month for all nonfarm employment as well as for the sectors most impacted by vaccine and testing policies. The monthly data are volatile, but changes for nonfarm employment and government employment appear to move in tandem for states with vaccine requirements and states with prohibitions. In the healthcare industry, employment generally grew faster in states with vaccine and testing requirements, particularly in August, September, and October as policies went into effect, though growth slowed in November. Similarly, employment in education generally rose more quickly during this period for states with vaccine and testing mandates.

The data reviewed here do not establish a causal relationship. At best, there are minimal negative effects of vaccine mandates on the rate of workers quitting their jobs during a surge of COVID-19 infections. There are multiple explanations for these results. It may be inferred that though some workers may quit rather than be vaccinated, more workers—particularly in industries with a higher risk of exposure—may be encouraged to stay by such protective measures. In addition, people responding to the survey might have overemphasized their opposition since it was a hypothetical rather than imminent issue. Finally, the quits rate increases when workers have confidence in the labor market. The states without mandates tended to be more open, so workers may have had more employment opportunities and therefore may have been more likely to quit.

vc_05

[1] Policies in 2021, sources: https://www.multistate.us/research/covid/public?category=Vaccine+Mandates, https://www.littler.com/publication-press/publication/mandatory-employee-vaccines-coming-state-near-you, and Chmura research.

[2] https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/poll-finding/kff-covid-19-vaccine-monitor-october-2021/

[3] Unfortunately, the survey did not pose a similar question in subsequent months, so there is not data on this question over time. See, for example, the November 2021 survey https://files.kff.org/attachment/TOPLINE-KFF-COVID-19-Vaccine-Monitor-November-2021.pdf

Subscribe to the Weekly Economic Update

Subscribe to the Weekly Economic Update and get news delivered straight to your inbox.

Explore related resources

Sep 16, 2025

Patrick Clapp

How JobsEQ Lets You Spend Time Analyzing, Not Just Gathering, Data

Jun 26, 2025

Colin Emberland

How Generative AI is Disrupting the Relationship Between the Labor Market and Stocks

Jun 23, 2025

Chris Chmura

Class of 2025: Navigating a Cooler Hiring Climate in Richmond

Apr 22, 2025

Mike Chmura

Leveraging AI-Supported Salary Data: 5 Key Takeaways for Better Hiring Intelligence

Apr 01, 2025

Patrick Clapp

Federal Layoffs Impact Early Retirement and Probationary Workers—Where Are They?

Mar 18, 2025

Mike Kyffin

Introducing Salary Sonar: Real-Time Compensation Benchmarking

Dec 17, 2024

Jess Banas

Connecticut Planning Regions Replace Counties in JobsEQ

Dec 09, 2024

Former Chmura Staff

Introducing the Housing Demand Analytic: The latest piece of the attraction and expansion puzzle

A Ho-Hum Holiday? Retailers Brace for Subdued Holiday Sales Growth

Nov 04, 2024

Chris Chmura

A Ho-Hum Holiday? Retailers Brace for Subdued Holiday Sales Growth

Sep 30, 2024

Chris Chmura

Lack of R&D Spending Links To Job Loss

Sep 25, 2024

James Stinchcomb

Insights From Chmura's Latest Product Release: JobsEQ RTI Global Data

Aug 28, 2024

Francesco Renna

Data Centers Decoded: From Site Selection to Economic Impact