Data
JobsEQ

Why are the data missing? (and how JobsEQ fills the gaps)

You go to look up employment in an industry for one of your largest employers, but instead of a number you find (ND), or maybe the industry is just...

You go to look up employment in an industry for one of your largest employers, but instead of a number you find (ND), or maybe the industry is just not shown at all. What does that mean, and why aren’t some data available?

“ND” (or “n.d.” or similar variations) in data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) indicates that those data are Not Disclosable. The data have been collected; however, they have been suppressed in public releases.

How much data are affected and how could it impact your analysis? The image shown here gives a snapshot of Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) data for every state at the state level. Each line represents a row of data and an industry at various levels of detail. Yellow lines indicate data are available while blue lines show suppressions.

 

You are more likely to run into data which cannot be disclosed when looking for more detailed information, for cases such as a small geography or an industry with only a handful of employers. You’ll also find suppression when there is a single large employer that dominates a regional industry.

The primary rule the BLS uses for whether or not to disclose data is when one of the following is true:

  • There are fewer than three establishments in an industry for a certain geography, or
  • One employer accounts for more than 80% of all employment in an industry in the area.[1]

In addition, data may not be released if it would violate a state’s disclosure rules. Further, data is not disclosed if it could be used to calculate another suppressed data point.

If data are not disclosed because there are fewer than three establishments, the impact on the data user may be small as the involved employment may likewise be low. However, missing data due to a large employer that dominates regional employment could significantly skew total employment numbers.

Chmura’s JobsEQ fills in these gaps in the data. Estimates are made from combining many other data sources for reliable information, with modeling backed by our team of economists, statisticians, and data scientists to ensure accuracy and reliability at all levels of detail.

Curious what QCEW looks like at the county level? Just keep scrolling down.

 

[1] Some states use rules that are more restrictive than the these.

Subscribe to the Weekly Economic Update

Subscribe to the Weekly Economic Update and get news delivered straight to your inbox.

Explore related resources

Mar 18, 2025

Mike Kyffin

Introducing Salary Sonar: Real-Time Compensation Benchmarking

Dec 17, 2024

Jess Banas

Connecticut Planning Regions Replace Counties in JobsEQ

Dec 09, 2024

Lindsay Day

Introducing the Housing Demand Analytic: The latest piece of the attraction and expansion puzzle

Sep 25, 2024

James Stinchcomb

Insights From Chmura's Latest Product Release: JobsEQ RTI Global Data

Aug 28, 2024

Francesco Renna

Data Centers Decoded: From Site Selection to Economic Impact

Jul 26, 2024

Nolan Boyea

Profits and Peril: Tourism as an economic development strategy

Jun 27, 2024

Henry Switz

On a roll or not? A look at American hot dog consumption

Jun 05, 2024

Greg Chmura

Is Work From Home Driving Unknown County Employment Higher?

Jun 04, 2024

Mike Chmura

The State of AI Jobs and Talent — We've Ranked Every MSA

May 13, 2024

Greg Chmura

Accuracy Matters: Preliminary Employment Estimates

May 09, 2024

Lindsay Hurt

Harnessing Data: The Cornerstone of Business Attraction in Economic Development

May 07, 2024

James Stinchcomb

JobsEQ RTI Update: Better Sources and Years of Experience